Far too many people and government bodies treat the IPCC as if it was the epitome of good science, impartial analysis and an open mind as to what drives climate cycles.

But shouldn’t you be suspicious of an organization that seeks to imply (or fails to correct false perceptions) that:

• it is impartial when it is clearly not
• that its authors and reviewers have no vested interest when most do
• that its climate models are accurate when they are not
• that all reviewers support the IPCC’s fundamental claims when very few explicitly do so
• that its authors have a wide range of opinions and experience when many work together or have co-authored papers together
• that all its authors support the critical claim when many merely reported on observations and far more others had to work from the assumption that the claim was correct?

Here are 50 articles that seriously question the credibility and integrity of the IPCC’s activities and claims.

See: http://mclean.ch/climate/IPCC.htm