FaceTime generally is a video calling service that enables you to connect one user to another provided both should be having the same FaceTime application in their devices. FaceTime application is compatible with devices like iPhone, iPad or iPod touch. FaceTime video call will enable you to connect with your friends and family instantly for free absolutely through the Wi-Fi connections.

However, FaceTime is the best way of connection between miles of km away from each other through the video calls as it will run smoothly as long as you’re Wi-Fi and data remains connected. The user interface of FaceTime is so simple and easy to use and understands and has lots of cool features that make the application favorable for every iPhone, iPad, iPod users.

Features of FaceTime application

Amazingly FaceTime application has lots of cool applications that make the users very enjoy it without facing any complications.

• FaceTime application is compatible with devices like iPhone, iPad, iPod, etc.
• FaceTime works as long as your devices get connected with Wi-Fi as well as it works on a cellular data plan that works without Wi-Fi.
• FaceTime enables to connect with your friends and family instantly and for the free of cost. Provided the person should have the same application with his or her iPhone, iPad, iPod devices.
• FaceTime lets you choose whether you want to make an audio call or video call.
• The User interface is very simple and easy to understand and navigate.
• Through FaceTime, you also get the features to block any unknown who tried to FaceTime with you.

How to Use FaceTime with your iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch?

It is very simple and easy to use FaceTime with your devices like iPhone, iPad or iPod touch. Follow the uses process instructions carefully that is mentioned below:

1. First of all, you need to launch the application from the above Home Screen of your devices like Facetime for iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch.
2. Next, on your devices of right side screen, you will see all your entire contacts which you have to save on your address book. So simply click on anyone whom you want to make a FaceTime call.
3. Now you will see that specific person’s contact card and details, so you have an option to select either through their email address or by the phone number. Make sure that the person has an active FaceTime application else the FaceTime won’t work.
4. Wait for some time while the FaceTime call is getting access or connecting to the person.
5. When the person whom you make a call accepts your video call his or her image will be shown on the right side of the screen.

Conclusions:   

So this is all about how to use FaceTime application on your devices like iPad, iPhone, and iPod touch. You will simply love the application once you know the value of it especially when you are miles away and get a chance to see your parents face through this FaceTime.

If you need a video editing app or software, there are many options to choose from. You can easily find the best video editing software on the web, these days because there is a wide range of video editing apps available for android, computers or laptop devices. Here is one app that is very famous, known as Viva Video. It is actually not meant for Windows computer, but there are some third party applications that can help you to use this app on these devices. One of the most popular third party applications is the Bluestacks.

After downloading the third party app on your window based device, you can get viva video for pc in an easy manner. It is an app, which allows you to edit your videos as you want. It is also considered as video camera editing tools. These days, a number of people are using this app and happy with the effects. It has gained a higher rank in the Google Play Store. You can also use it on the iOS devices. So, if you are a person looking for a way to use this app on the PC, then you need to have its APK file.

Steps to Download VivaVideo for PC, Laptop:

Even though, this app is available for android users only, even PC users can use it. All you need to do is to have the Bluestacks. Without any error, if you have Bluestacks, then this app can be run on your computer. There is a need of following a proper procedure, when it comes to using this app on your PC. The first and foremost step you need to take is to download the Bluestacks on your computer or laptop, whatever you are using, and then you can proceed further. There are some steps, which are necessary to follow while using the vivavideo for pc, look at them:

• Getting started with the process needs some attention and proper knowledge. Firstly, you need to have the APK file for this app on your computer. It can be downloaded online.
• After installing it, click on it and then right click on it. You will find the option known as ‘Open with Bluestacks installer.’ it is important to know that it will take some time to complete the installation process. Afterwards, you can go ahead.

Once you are done with these steps, you are ready to edit the videos to make them customized according to your needs and preferences. It will like a melting of ice cream when you will use this app. editing on this app will give you an exciting time. What are you waiting for? Start using this app, if you love to create videos and customize them for various purposes. It is very easy to use this app, if you have an android or iOS device. No matter if you have a computer having windows installed; you can also make use of this video editing app. Have fun while using this app and editing videos without any hassle.

Before governments can improve oil security for their people they need to learn how markets work, or their policies will do more harm than good. This submission discusses the effects of suppliers, consumers, traders and governments in the oil market, why “Peak Oil” is a mirage which recedes as you approach it, how methane hydrates may provide the next energy revolution, how governments reduce oil security, why biofuels and alternative energy will not fuel our transport fleet, the hydrogen myth and why “Hands Off” is the best policy.

Read the full submission [PDF, 49 KB] to the Queensland State government.

A response to the Green Paper on Climate Change – a comment by Viv Forbes, Chairman of the Carbon Sense Coalition. 16 July 2008

The Climate will fluctuate.
It always has, it always will.
Get used to it.

The Government Green Paper completely ignores the main question – should Canberra try to control the weather, or is it better to foster a strong Australia able to cope with whatever climate change brings us?

The Government also justifies the need for action on completely worthless long term forecasts of Australia’s weather.
(more…)

Dear Professor Garnaut,

I note that your review has been commissioned to “examine the impacts of climate change on the Australian economy, and recommend medium to long-term policies and policy frameworks to improve the prospects for sustainable prosperity”.

As written, this is a straightforward if challenging task. Unwritten, however, is that the term “climate change” today carries connotations of human causation, thanks mainly to lobby group pressure and media propaganda. This transforms a straightforward task into one of immense complexity, because of the existence of both many unresolved, controversial scientific issues and the fierce environmental politics that becomes involved.
(more…)

The editor,

Did you know there is a “St. Andrews Sustainability Institute”? (I suppose before global warming alarmism became a fungible activity, their role was recovery of – er, lost balls.) See this link:

St Andrews golf course ‘could sink into sea by 2050’

Now, I’d like to see a “Cinque Ports Sustainability Institute”, which will show that rising sea levels will restore 14th century Rye (now stranded inland on the Romney Marshes, about 5 miles from the Sussex beaches of southern England) to its status as a sea port, doing what it used to do best — smuggle in French Brandy and Burgundy wines under the noses of HM Customs! A positive effect for catastrophic global warming at last!

Any takers?

Malcolm Ross
Annandale, Virginia, USA

The Carbon Sense Coalition has awarded its Inaugural Golden Fleece Award to Kevin Rudd and coal industry leaders for “flagrant fleecing of community savings in futile ‘research’ on Carbon Capture & Sequestration – a costly and complex process designed to capture and bury carbon dioxide gas produced by burning carbon fuels such as coal, oil and gas”.

It is obviously possible, in an engineering sense, to collect, separate, compress, pump and pipe gases, so new “research” is largely a waste of money. Engineers know how to do these things, and their likely costs. But only foolish green zealots would think of spending billions to bury a harmless, invisible, life-supporting gas in hopes of cooling the climate some time in the century ahead.

About 2.5 tonnes of carbon dioxide are produced for every tonne of coal burnt in a power station. To capture, compress and bury it could take at least 30% of the electricity produced, greatly increasing the cost of the limited amount of electricity left for sale – more coal used, increased electricity costs, for ZERO measurable benefits.

We have come to expect stupidity from politicians, but coal industry leaders who agreed to waste money on this should be sued by shareholders for negligence. Maybe they were just drooling at all the extra coal they would sell in order to produce the same electricity?

Kevin Rudd wins this award for “a Flagrant Fleece of $400 million taken from tax payers to fund the fatuous Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute.” There is little to show for the millions already spent except a lot of receipts for high class salaries, consultants, travel, entertainment and “operational expenses”.

Pumping gases underground is sensible if it brings real benefits such as using waste gases to drive oil recovery from declining oil fields.

Normally, however, CCS will just produce more expensive electricity.

This result is not needed as politicians have already invented dozens of ways of doing just that.

More, as well as:

• The Warming of the last Century is too Small to Notice
• Clean Coal by Wire
• The New Cold War
• The Great Barrier Reef
• A revival of the Medieval Practice of Book Burning
• The Beginning of the End

Read the full report: http://carbon-sense.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/golden-fleece-award.pdf [PDF, 133 KB]

Keywords: Golden Fleece Award, carbon capture and sequestration, London, Los Angeles and Asian smogs, dust, save the Great Barrier
Reef, book-burning academics, climatism waning.

The Case for Repeal

We support the immediate repeal of the carbon tax. This tax was introduced by stealth, and the justification for its introduction is spurious. It should be repealed or made ineffective immediately.

We are told its purpose is to “reduce carbon pollution” – just three words, each of which is based on a lie.

• “Reduce”: The effect of Australia’s carbon tax on the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is so tiny as to be undetectable and any miniscule reduction would be totally swamped in the far bigger natural seasonal variations of carbon dioxide levels. The effect on global climate, if any, would also be too small to be measured and of no benefit to the climate or life on Earth.
• “Carbon”: It is NOT a tax on carbon. Carbon is a solid – either soft and black like graphite and soot, or crystalline, hard and beautiful like diamond. It is definitely not the colourless gas created when carbon is burned. The “carbon” tax falls mainly on carbon dioxide, a colourless, harmless natural gas which has always been present in Earth’s atmosphere, usually in far greater amounts than at present. The use of “carbon” when referring to “carbon dioxide” is a deliberate deception. It would be like calling liquid water by the name “hydrogen”, a major element in the water molecule which is a dangerous explosive flammable gas. Based on the carbon example, a tax on water vapour (another “greenhouse gas) would probably be called “The Hydrogen Tax” by government propagandists.
• “Pollution”: Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant, and should never have been called one. It is the essential gas-of-life for all plants and they support all animals on Earth. It is no more a pollutant than oxygen, which is the gas-of-life for animals, or water vapour which is essential for all life. All three gases have effects on earth’s surface temperature, and on surface life, and such effects are usually highly beneficial. Additional carbon dioxide has been improving and will continue to improve the growth rate and drought tolerance of all plants on earth. Far from polluting the Earth, extra carbon dioxide has been greening the globe for decades.

There has been no attempt at an independent cost benefit analysis to justify the tax.

More, as well as:

• Petition
• John Howard Joins the Deniers (well almost)
• The Many Benefits of CO2
• Keeping a Sense of Perspective on Global Warming
• Funds Flow in, in Enormous Dollops

Read the full report: http://carbon-sense.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/cold-turkey2.pdf [PDF, 140KB]

Keywords: Carbon Tax, deceptive advertising, cost-benefits, enquiry into the science, pollution, National Pollution Inventory Scheme, Kyoto Agreement, price surveillance, IPCC, Climate Change Authority, Direct Action, renewable energy targets.

By Carl Brehmer

“Evidence of widespread control of fire dates to approximately 125,000 years.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_of_fire_by_early_humans

Many people assert that environmental extremists want to take civilization back to a pre-industrial state some 150-200 years ago, but the achievement of a “carbon free economy” would take humanity back at least 125,000 years before the discovery and control of fire, because that is the source of the carbon dioxide emissions that have now been declared “pollution.” Even as the somewhat obscure term “cap-and-trade” is a little more clear when called a “carbon tax”, even more clarity would be achieved by calling it a tax on the use of fire, because that is what it is. In their role as fuels, all hydrocarbons are useless until they are burned, which produces the energy that has fuelled human progress and provided the following benefits, which even the environmental extremists and various “rent takers” take for granted:

1) Light; even kerosene lanterns burn fossil fuel and produce carbon dioxide.

2) Heat; ask the victims of hurricane Sandy or anybody who experiences a power outage about the value of heat. Even primitive people use fire for heat.

3) Communication; all modern forms of communication depend upon the power provided by the energy derived from fire.

4) Rapid travel; what form of travel today isn’t powered by the use of fire? Trains, planes and automobiles are all powered with fire.

5) Escape from countless hours of physical labour. Prior to the discovery and use of fire, especially that used to produce electricity, disparate groups of human being were stuck in separate small communities around the world forced to spend most of their time in physical labour.

6) Inventions such as the modern computer and the rapid, worldwide communication network, which includes cell phones, e-mail and the internet would not have been developed nor could they be sustained by the intermittent, low density energy derived from solar cells and wind mills.

7) Satellites, both communication and weather; how many satellites have been launched into space without the use of fire? Many, but not all, are sent to space by hydrocarbon fuels. (Even those satellites that study outgoing long wave radiation and have futilely been attempting to prove that increasing levels of carbon dioxide are causing catastrophic climate change.)

8) One of the consequences of using fire as an energy source is that it has provided many people with enough time on their hands to debate whether or not fire is a good thing, i.e., the global warming AKA climate change AKA biodiversity AKA sustainable development debate.

(Remember also that environmental extremists not only want to ban the use of fire for energy production; they want to ban the use of nuclear energy and hydroelectric energy as well.)

The vast amount of energy that the use of fire has placed at the disposal of humanity has been used to revolutionize the nature of our existence. The mere fact that fire was a source of light and heat independent of the sun meant that humans could roam beyond the tropics into the damp, cold regions of the north with seasons of snow and long freezing nights. It was fire and fire alone that enabled man to become a creature native to the entire world and not just the tropics. In addition, the heat of the fire, i.e. cooking, brought about changes in our food supply that made otherwise inedible food palatable and nourishing. Fire has not only increased the variety of food that humans can eat, it also powers the diesel tractors used in modern farming. Our food supply has consequently multiplied beyond the wildest dreams of our ancient ancestors. Current world hunger problems are primarily distribution problems not quantity problems.

Nor has the importance of fire diminished with time; rather the reverse. Wood was no doubt the first fuel used in building and maintaining a fire, but coal took primacy over wood in the 17th century. In the 20th century these two fuels were join by gasoline and oil. In the 21st century shale oil and natural gas are gaining importance.

If the “powers that be” really thought that the continued use of fire was causing a climate catastrophe they would ban its use all together, but it would seem that they just want a piece of the action. The cap-and-trade scheme is not unlike property tax in which the government just lays claim to your property and starts charging you rent, i.e. property tax. (If you think that you own your home just stop paying your property tax and see what happens.) The cap-and-trade scheme is the government just laying claim on all fossil fuel resource within its jurisdiction and charging people a fee to burn them as an energy source.

“The power to tax is the power to destroy.” (John Marshall in McCulloch v. Maryland 17 U.S. 327)

It could be that humans will eventually run out of things to burn, but that day keeps getting pushed back by innovation. For the present I can’t think of a more efficient way to destroy our society’s prosperity, which has brought us all of the above benefits, than to impose a tax on the use of fire. It leaves me wondering; in what kind of society do we now live in which we have to buy a license to use fire as an energy source, something that has been free for 125,000 years? And who exactly are we paying these fees to in order to obtain the privilege of burning that which nature provides?

Carl Brehmer

(Slightly edited from the original.)

by Mike Bailey

I am a retired Surveyor who spent his whole career (1965 to 2010) measuring and recording:

• Water depths, to enable safe navigation of ships and boats into harbours.
• Coastal features, such as shorelines and beaches, to monitor changes in depth that occur over time.
• Near shore constructions, such as sea walls, groynes wharves, piers and jetties and boat ramps to monitor their effect on the surrounding areas.

In order for these depth measurements to have any coherence they have to be related to a common reference level. In Australia this common reference level or Datum is the Australian Height Datum (AHD).

AHD is a mean sea level datum and was established by analysis of data from recording tide gauges which operate in ports around Australia and which in some cases have been operating for around a century. (see below) I have not found any proposal that this datum be changed due to the rising sea level.

AHD was adopted by the National Mapping Council in May 1971 as the datum to which all vertical control for mapping was to be referred.

(more…)