|
|
Dear Carbon Sense,
I had a spare moment, and for some reason it was spent pondering Climate Change.
Suddenly, like a bolt of lightening… bells and whistles went off… I’m onto something.
I need support, and confidently believe you will jump on board to back me with the following research into Climate Change.
I am preparing my own submission to examine a subject that has not been appraised: “The Damage Climate Change will make to Fashion (including associated industries)”. I will not be investigating the inconsequential slaughter of innocent wildlife within fashion, as this may well prejudice the findings. In fact, the fashion industry is saving these poor creatures from the scientifically proven Climatical catastrophe we mere humans are facing.
There appears to be a vital call for extensive funding before it is too late, as the Paris, Rome, New York and London Fashion industries will disintegrate due to predicted continuing seasonal uncertainties brought about by Climate Change. The complete loss of winter, spring, autumn and summer fashion releases together with the gala events accompanying these seasonal releases will bring about a Global Economic Collapse, causing millions to become unemployed. This widespread calamity will bring to an end the Asian, Mexican and African sweat-shops, forcing hundreds of thousands, if not millions of starving, emaciated, suffering humans to become Global Refugees, as they can not ALL survive by manufacturing only shorts, T-shirts and thongs (flip-flops) as the unprecedented rising temperature continues upwards.
We MUST act immediately to prevent the future misery that will be enforced on our daughters and their daughters… and their daughters… and in some cases our sons; sons who will never experience the understanding and self gratification of this season’s ‘new dress’, or the ‘new shoes, or the new Armani Jeans, watch or cologne.
We can NOT stand by and turn our backs on this forthcoming, predestined, inevitable tragedy. WE MUST ACT NOW!!
I wish to embark on this research with a round-the-globe trip to establish how Climate Change is having an effect on the natural physical and biological form of bikini-clad, young ladies’ nipples, and what affect, if any, the proliferation of Global Warming, due to anthropogenic CO2 escalation, will have on their natural rise and fall.
I am presently working on a couple of models… however due to privacy laws and the small matter of a restraining order, I can not advise you of their names at this time.
Are you interested in assisting in this research and how much funding do you think we will require?
All donations will be accepted and not accounted for.
Your future children saving friend,
Rick Gore-Flannery (changed name by dead pole so people would believe me)
November 9th, 2009 |
Categories: Letters |
[Original source: www.sepp.org/policy%20declarations/LDrevised.html]
As independent scientists researching atmospheric and climate problems, we — along with many of our fellow citizens -– are apprehensive about the Climate Treaty conference scheduled for Kyoto, Japan, in December 1997. This gathering of politicians from some 160 signatory nations aims to impose — on citizens of the industrialized nations, but not on others — a system of global environmental regulations that include quotas and punitive taxes on energy fuels.
(more…)
June 1st, 2008 |
Categories: Policy Issues |
The right response to the non-problem of global warming is to have the courage to do nothing.
Christopher Monckton
February 25th, 2010 |
Categories: Quotes |
By Ray Evans
Excerpt:
‘In recent years another Czech threat expert has been sounding the trumpet for freedom. Vaclav Klaus was born in Prague in 1941 and became an outstanding student in economics, graduating from the University of Economics in Prague in 1963. He was allowed to study abroad in Italy in 1966 and in the USA in 1969, where he came under the influence of Milton Friedman. In 1968 he was awarded his PhD from the Institute of Economics of the Czech Academy of Sciences. From 1970 until 1987 he was kept under wraps in the State Bank of Czechoslovakia, but after the successful uprising of November 1989 he was appointed Federal Minister of Finance, and he became Prime Minister in June 1992. In February 2003, and again in February 2008, he was elected President of the Czech Republic.
‘The presidency is a non-executive role and so Vaclav Klaus has been able to immerse himself in the global warming debate. He has written a book entitled Blue, Not Green Planet, published in Czech last year and due out in English translation (as Blue Planet in Green Shackles) in the USA this May. He has spoken regularly on the issue at home and abroad. In February 2007 he was interviewed by a Prague journalist who took him to task for his refusal to accept the global warming thesis now hegemonial throughout Europe. Klaus was very blunt: “Global warming is a false myth and every serious person and scientist says so.”’
Read the complete article on the Quadrant Magazine site: http://quadrant.org.au/php/article_view.php?article_id=3936
June 7th, 2008 |
Categories: The Evidence |
Carbon is the essential building block for all living things.
But life cannot exist without energy.
The primary energy of the solar system is nuclear energy – it powers the sun which floods the Earth with solar radiation; other nuclear reactions release heat deep within the planet. But solar energy alone cannot create or sustain life.
Earth’s primeval atmosphere had three natural gases that contained the essential ingredients for the first plant life – carbon dioxide, the food for plants; water, the drink for plants; and ammonia, which probably supported the first primitive life forms. It also had methane, the first natural (non-fossil) hydro-carbon fuel. Ancient atmospheres had far more methane and carbon dioxide than is present today (but no runaway global warming).
Life emerged in water when primitive plants using solar energy and the magic of photosynthesis took carbon dioxide from the atmosphere to create sugars, fats and proteins in their leaves, stems, roots, seeds and fruits. Their exhaust product was another natural gas – oxygen.
Millions of years passed, and slowly the plants consumed carbon dioxide and added oxygen to the atmosphere.
Primitive animals then evolved; they used oxygen to extract carbon energy stored in plants. They consumed these carbon fuels and exhausted carbon dioxide. Life is truly a carbon equation.
Carbon fuels such as wood, biomass, coal and oil are essentially preserved organic materials that store solar energy. When burnt in air they release stored energy and exhaust the same valuable by-product – carbon dioxide.
The human race depends totally on carbon based foods that are derived from the gas of life, carbon dioxide, plus nitrogen, minerals and water. And since the invention of engines, humans have come to depend on reliable, efficient, energy-dense, portable carbon fuels to grow, harvest, transport, refrigerate, process, distribute and cook food. The exhaust product from all of these engines is an important stimulant to the growth of all plants.
Without carbon dioxide, no life would exist. And without carbon fuels, modern cities would starve within weeks.
A tax on carbon is thus a tax on life.
Viv Forbes
January 15th, 2013 |
Categories: Carbon Cycle, Carbon tax |
“In climate research and modelling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.”
– IPCC Third Assessment Report (TAR; 2001), Section 142.2.2, page 774
June 6th, 2011 |
Categories: Forecasting, IPCC |
By Emeritus Professor Lance Endersbee, AO.
The accompanying paper, Climate Change is Nothing New [PDF, 1.2MB], was published in the March 2007 issue of the journal, New Concepts in Global Tectonics (http://www.ncgt.org/).
I was invited to prepare the paper by the Editor as a scientific response to the IPCC report, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policy Makers, issued by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, February 2007. The paper can also be regarded as a response to the movie by Al Gore, and to the report on carbon trading by the London financier, Sir Nicholas Stern.
The key points of the paper are:-
(more…)
December 30th, 2007 |
Categories: The Evidence |
Graham Williamson, Sydney, Australia
September 2018
Controlling Climate and Global Wealth Redistribution – a costly agenda indeed!
2015 was a very big year for the global problem solvers at the UN. In September Australia’s former Foreign minister, Julie Bishop, signed the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals agenda, and in December the UN conducted the Paris climate change conference, which was later signed by Australia’s Environment Minister, Greg Hunt. Earlier, in July the same year, Australia participated in the Addis Ababa Action Agenda to discuss ways of financing the UN’s exceedingly costly agenda.
The first part of this agenda, namely, controlling the climate, is extremely costly in itself, and the folks at the UN tell us they need much more of our money to turn down the heat. But they also need more of our money to pay the ‘climate debt’ to compensate socialist and theocratic countries, which seem to be selectively targeted by our ‘damaging’ CO2 emissions, or so the story goes.
However, the really big dollars are needed to implement Julie Bishop’s 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals. For this agenda the UN needs a further $6 trillion annually so we can all be compelled to manage our properties and lifestyles correctly and meet the UN’s ‘sustainability’ requirements. And under SDG 4.7 the UN seeks to teach our children, through global citizenship education, that only the UN can ‘solve’ problems which the UN defines as ‘global’ problems. So called ‘climate change’ is ‘global problem’ SDG 13. The $6 trillion figure is expected to blow out considerably as fixing the climate and ensuring the sustainability of the earth, and educating children to believe all this, is a costly business indeed. No wonder virtually all government departments are devoted to helping the UN. (more…)
September 19th, 2018 |
Categories: The Carbon Sense Coalition |
There are many reasons why Error 3194 While Restoring Ipod 3g happen, including having malware, spyware, or projects not introducing appropriately. You can have a wide range of framework clashes, registry mistakes, and Active X blunders. Reimage spends significant time in Windows repair. It sweeps and judgments, at that point repairs, your harmed PC with innovation that fixes your Windows Operating System, as well as turns around the harm effectively finished with a full database of substitution documents.
A FREE Scan (approx. 5 minutes) into your PC’s Windows Operating System recognizes issues partitioned into 3 classifications – Hardware, Security and Stability. Toward the finish of the output, you can audit your PC’s Hardware, Security and Stability in examination with an overall normal. You can audit a rundown of the issues recognized amid your output. Will Reimage settle my Fix Error 3194 in iTunes While Restoring Ipod 3g issue? There’s no real way to tell without running the program. The condition of individuals’ PCs shifts fiercely, contingent upon the distinctive specs and programming they’re running, so regardless of whether reimage could settle Error 3194 While Restoring Ipod 3g on one machine doesn’t really mean it will settle it on all machines. Gratefully it just takes minutes to run a sweep and see what issues Reimage can distinguish and settle.
Windows Errors
A Windows mistake is a blunder that happens when an unforeseen condition happens or when a coveted operation has fizzled. When you have a mistake in Windows, it might be basic and make your projects stop and crash or it might be apparently innocuous yet irritating.
Blue Screen of Death
A stop blunder screen or bug check screen, usually called a blue screen of death (otherwise called a BSoD, bluescreen), is caused by a deadly framework mistake and is the mistake screen showed by the Microsoft Windows group of working frameworks after experiencing a basic mistake, of a non-recoverable nature, that makes the framework “crash”.
Harmed DLLs
One of the greatest reasons for DLL’s getting to be plainly degenerate/harmed is the act of always introducing and uninstalling programs. This frequently implies DLL’s will get overwritten by fresher variants when another program is introduced, for instance. This causes issues for those applications and projects that still need the old variant to work. Along these lines, the program starts to glitch and crash.
Solidifying Computer
PC hanging or solidifying happens when either a program or the entire framework stops to react to inputs. In the most usually experienced situation, a program stops and all windows having a place with the solidified program end up noticeably static. Quite often, the best way to recuperate from a framework solidify is to reboot the machine, for the most part by control cycling with an on/off or reset catch.
Infection Damage
Once your PC has been contaminated with an infection, it’s never again the same. In the wake of evacuating it with your hostile to infection programming, you’re regularly left with waiting reactions. In fact, your PC may never again be contaminated, however that doesn’t mean it’s sans blunder. Indeed, even just expelling an infection can really hurt your framework.
Working System Recovery
Reimage repairs and replaces every single basic Window framework records expected to run and restart accurately, without hurting your client information. Reimage additionally reestablishes traded off framework settings and registry esteems to their default Microsoft settings. You may dependably restore your framework to its pre-repair condition.
December 16th, 2009 |
Categories: The Carbon Sense Coalition |
By Dr. Jay Lehr
Source: https://www.cfact.org/2019/04/10/its-time-for-us-all-to-recognize-the-97-con-game/
We are confident that all of our readers have read or heard for a number of years that 97% of all scientists believe that mankind has played a role in changing the earth’s climate. While it should have been recognized long ago as an urban myth, one of those stories that hang around regardless of a lack of any supporting facts. Rarely a day goes that a global warming alarmists do not use it to promote their cause of enlarging government and reducing personal freedom through the promotion of fear about our future.
Many articles have been written to refute this claim but they all dig into the statistical weeds. Common sense alone should set you straight. If the reader wishes he or she read could read the original paper by Naomi Oreskes that started it all in Science Magazine in December of 2004. Be aware you might die laughing.
(more…)
April 15th, 2019 |
Categories: Consensus |
« Previous Page — Next Page »
|